Well, with a statically typed language this would be a problem. What if we used duck-typing to get around this?
Granted, this wouldn't work for anything that gets passed to Java, but the following gist would be a start. http://gist.github.com/176032 Now, We'd still have to address Mr. Pratley's issue of which fn to implement, but now we have an option. Thoughts? Sean On Aug 26, 10:01 pm, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 26, 9:46 pm, Timothy Pratley <timothyprat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > java.util.regex.Pattern > > > I imagine a wrapper class could be returned instead that implemented > > IFn and Pattern, > > Unfortunately, Pattern is a final class. > > Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---