You might find these pages somewhat helpful: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Clojure_Programming/Examples/API_Examples http://clj-doc.s3.amazonaws.com/tmp/doc-1116/index.html http://java.ociweb.com/mark/clojure/ClojureCategorized.html
More generally, I'd agree that the Clojure sites need some structural work. For example, I count no fewer than three wikis associated with the project -- on Wikibooks, GitHub and Assembla. (Actually, you might count five including clojure.org itself and the old Google Code account.) Are there plans to improve Clojure's web presence? Is there any way to contribute work towards it? On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Ollie Saunders <oliver.saund...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Hi Clojurians, > > I've been learning Clojure for about 5 or so days (I'm osaunders on > the channel) now and I'm liking it a lot. However, the lack of > structure of http://clojure.org/api is hampering my learning a bit. I > wonder other people think it might be a nice idea to organise the > functions into something more structured with each function having > it's own page complete with: forms, basic description, remarks, > examples, and importantly (for me) related functions. > > I wouldn't mind doing a bit of work here and there in a wiki to make > that happen. I'm sure with a number of contributors the basic > functions could be covered quite quickly and over the weeks and months > it could unfurl into a rather nice language reference. > > Ollie > > > > -- Abhishek Reddy http://abhishek.geek.nz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
