Looks very interesting ! One question: wouldn't seem more natural to have transient named transient! and persistent! named persistent ?
I see a call to transient as "Enter the mutable world", so it seems to me (transient! []) conveys more this meaning than (transient []). I see a call to persistent! as "Enter back the immutable world", so (persistent v) seems more interesting than (persistent! v) ? And also, there may be the use case where some pure functions would protect their arguments by calling persistent! on them : This: (defn some-fn [v] (let [v (persistent v)] ...) looks better in a pure function than this: (defn some-fn [v] (let [v (persistent! v)] ...) where the ! catches the eye ... HTH, -- Laurent 2009/8/3 Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> > > I've been doing some work on Transient Data Structures. You can read > about them here: > > http://clojure.org/transients > > Feedback welcome, > > Rich > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
