On Jul 5, 10:53 am, igorrumiha <igorrum...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it's safe to say that once again it's proved that Clojure > easily matches the Java level of performance.
I think one shouldn't generalize from one [unverified] example. Personally, I'll wait for Jon Harrop or someone to port the relevant Shootout benchmarks or his "Ray tracing" benchmark to Clojure and see what time they get and what the code looks like. For example, some people claim that Haskell is as fast as C, while also being very high-level, but when you look at the Shootout, you'll see that it's BS: they are doing pointer arithmetic in Haskell, for Christ's sake! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
