On Jun 26, 3:51 pm, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > By using quote, and not syntax-quote, you have written an > intentionally capturing macro
Acc, I missed that. I have read the documentation of syntax-quote now: "" For Symbols, syntax-quote resolves the symbol in the current context, yielding a fully-qualified symbol (i.e. namespace/name or fully.qualified.Classname). If a symbol is non-namespace-qualified and ends with '#', it is resolved to a generated symbol with the same name to which '_' and a unique id have been appended. e.g. x# will resolve to x_123. All references to that symbol within a syntax-quoted expression resolve to the same generated symbol. "" That means that I do not need gensym, I can just add a `#` to the identifiers I want to introduce hygienically, right? I guess this is what you meant by autogensym in the other post. A pretty cool idea, actually. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
