On Jun 26, 9:53 am, Michele Simionato <michele.simion...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I want to asset the status of Clojure
> macros with respect to hygiene.
Some further experiment:
$ clj
Clojure 1.1.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT
user=> (def x 42)
#'user/x
user=> (defmacro m[] 'x)
#'user/m
user=> (m)
42
user=> (let [x 43] (m))
43
There is no referential transparency, it seems. Also, it looks like
Clojure macros are runtime macros,
i.e. they may depend from runtime values and macro expansion cannot be
performed statically
without running the program (which is usually considered pretty bad).
Am I correct?
Finally, as an unrelated question, is there an equivalent of macrolet
in Clojure?
Thanks,
Michele Simionato
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
