Hi all, Among the last interesting proposals, some seem not possible to follow, because the names are already used :
corona : sounded good, but already used (and it's even an eclipse subproject) Eclisp: already used by a lisp project for eclipse clipse: not really used, but very closed to eclipse So far, we still have : enclave pinhole REPtiLe EclipseClojure (along the lines of VimClojure) Eclair conjclipse (?) Troy (!?!) Ectoplasm (!?!) cljdt (?) eclj (?) I guess this ml will quickly get tired of helping the (currently named) clojure-dev team choose a new name, but for those not yet tired of this, please (re-)react :-) 2009/6/24 Antony Blakey <antony.bla...@gmail.com> > > eclisp :) > > On 24/06/2009, at 11:05 AM, Matthew Erker wrote: > > > > > I second that vote. > > (Though I prefer Clipse, which is somewhat taken.) > > > > > > On Jun 23, 6:47 pm, Rayne <disciplera...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I vote Corona. > > > > > > > Antony Blakey > ------------- > CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd > Ph: 0438 840 787 > > There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to > make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the > other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious > deficiencies. > -- C. A. R. Hoare > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
