On Jun 16, 10:43 pm, Richard Newman <holyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > The docs produced by the Git project aren't proprietary: there are > plenty at [1], not to mention `man git`. I just see a great deal of > value in clear, explanatory text
Enough value that there should be free clear, explanatory text about open source software, not just free dense, hard-to-use manuals, if you ask me. :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
