On Jun 5, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> > "Stephen C. Gilardi" <squee...@mac.com> writes: > >> (my-cool-database-operation the-database >> (arg-exp-1 with operands) >> literal-arg >> angstroms) >> >> There doesn't seem to be an easy way to distinguish these two types >> of >> initial operands (or the N-2 other types I've missed). "with-*" would >> probably seldom be wrong as an indicator of the second type. > > The only way I can think of is to connect to a running slime instance > and check to see if the var refers to a macro that takes a & body > argument. But this is a lot of moving parts for a slim benefit. It's > easier just to name these kinds of macros with-foo. =) I think Slime does this with CL. At least I seem to remember having code with macros that indented differently when the connection was established. — Daniel Lyons http://www.storytotell.org -- Tell It! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
