"Stephen C. Gilardi" <squee...@mac.com> writes: > (my-cool-database-operation the-database > (arg-exp-1 with operands) > literal-arg > angstroms) > > There doesn't seem to be an easy way to distinguish these two types of > initial operands (or the N-2 other types I've missed). "with-*" would > probably seldom be wrong as an indicator of the second type.
The only way I can think of is to connect to a running slime instance and check to see if the var refers to a macro that takes a & body argument. But this is a lot of moving parts for a slim benefit. It's easier just to name these kinds of macros with-foo. =) -Phil --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
