On 23.05.2009, at 02:13, Mark Engelberg wrote: > OK, after looking at deftemplate with macroexpand, it's starting to > make more sense. I suppose one downside to this versus load is that > it's probably much more difficult to debug (just because all your code > is wrapped in a macro), but basically I like the idea.
Right, debugging is always a bit more difficult with macros. Ideally, you'd have debugged most of the functions before wrapping them into a template. I have added deftemplate to clojure.contrib.macro-utils. I found that it is quite useful for lightweight macro programming: for very simple macros, it is easier to use than the standard templating mechanism with syntax-quote. I plan to add gensym support when I find the time. Konrad. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
