On Thu 21/05/09 17:43 , "Rich Hickey" richhic...@gmail.com sent:
>
> I'd like to do something modest but distinguishing. I have a vague
> notion of showing some Clojure data originating in some XML off the
> web, being passed to some filtering/walking code, getting displayed,
> stored in a DB, all without specific DOM/model/recordset APIs, a
> couple of lines for each task. This demonstrating the difference of
> not being OO - using generic abstract data types like maps everywhere.
I think something like this is a good idea. It is very practical.
I can't share the code, but I am doing something similar - using clojure to
build a pipeline that takes
different shaped queries as resultset-seqs, clusters related records into
groups, and pushes the groups
through the pipeline using lazy-seq. I can also swap in literal datastructures
in order to test the code
without depending on the database.
I guess there are lots of datasources that you could do something similar to
resultset-seq with. Atom feeds
(particularly ones with history rel=next links), OpenSearch query results,
queries to non-relational data-
stores, XMPP events...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
