On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Mark Volkmann > <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think time is the issue here. The Ant code may be too involved to >> describe in the time allotted. I do think it's important though to >> describe the use of Refs and STM. To me they are a very important >> feature of Clojure. > > They may be important, but is 4 minutes enough to show that are better > than just using threads and locking directly?
Yeah, 4 minutes is quite a restriction. It's just hard for me to imagine having the task of trying to convince people of the goodness of Clojure and not talking about STM. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
