On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Mark Volkmann <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think time is the issue here. The Ant code may be too involved to > describe in the time allotted. I do think it's important though to > describe the use of Refs and STM. To me they are a very important > feature of Clojure.
They may be important, but is 4 minutes enough to show that are better than just using threads and locking directly? -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
