On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Mark Engelberg > <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Konrad Hinsen >> <konrad.hin...@laposte.net> wrote: >>> It's the approach of "cloning and >>> mutating" something that smells of "quick and dirty", although I >>> agree it is quite convenient in the prototyping phase. >> >> I disagree that incremental extension of a module is a "quick and >> dirty" prototyping technique, and would argue that this is a >> fundamentally desirable feature. >> >> As an example, I authored clojure.contrib.math. Someone came up with >> a slightly faster algorithm for one of the functions (which is used in >> turn by other functions in the library), ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ah, ignore my answer then. Sorry for the noise :) -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
