as Holy wars can be (reference title), to me the same thing you edit in, has to have decorations in the project tree showing the version control stuff, which files have been messed with ... integrated diff, etc.
So I'm saying that a version control system is DEFINED by how well it works with eclipse in the same way that I've heard it said (not that I agree necessarily) that C is the best language in the world because it's the one that Knuth uses. But in all seriousness, I'll check out your links, and thank you :) On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Victor Rodriguez <vict...@gmail.com>wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:16 PM, e <evier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Git seems pretty interesting to me, too, which is why I tried for 7 hours > on > > my somewhat outdated Mac to try to get it to work nicely with eclipse and > > the git eclipse plugin. It was a total nightmare. I want my 7 hours > back. > > Don't discount git just because the Eclipse plugin is not good or you > could not get it to work. You may find a different tool that suits > you better. I use CVS and Eclipse every day at work, yet I always use > Emacs for CVS, I find it so much more convenient that the Eclipse > integration. > > For example, check out Magit, there is a very nice screencast > demonstrating it at > http://alexvollmer.com/index.php/2009/01/18/meet-magit/. There are > other videos about git, I recommend the ones from Linus Torvalds and > Randal Schwartz. > > Cheers, > > Victor Rodriguez. > > > Eventually I went with tried and true svn ... planning to revisit in the > > future. But let me understand ... when you do a commit, you haven't > really > > done anything that "counts"? Loaded question, I know, but it seems like > you > > have to do a commit, and then do a "send" or something, to actually share > > your changes. Is that right? > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Michel S. <michel.syl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Apr 24, 3:06 pm, Victor Rodriguez <vict...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Sean Devlin < > francoisdev...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > There recently was a ton of traffic about SCM in the "Path to 1.0" > >> > > thread. Google made the following announcement: > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2009/04/mercurial-support-for... > >> > > >> > > Does this make changing the SCM tool to Hg a real possibility? > While > >> > > this might not be such a big deal for Clojure core, I would *LOVE* > an > >> > > easy way to fork contrib, and I bet I'm not the only one. > >> > > >> > For what it is worth, I would also like the source to be kept under > Hg. > >> > > >> Hmm. How much of this has to do with Guido working for Google? ;). I'd > >> personally rather wait and see if Git ends up being added to the list > >> of supported DVCS: some open-source projects (GNOME, Dragonfly BSD) > >> are moving to it rather than Hg. > >> > >> I already have Git mirrors of the clojure and clojure-contrib > >> repositories; they are trivial to set up and keep up-to-date. A lot of > >> people here are probably doing that as well. Git even works relatively > >> well on Windows (I've used it lightly and not encountered a bug yet). > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> -- > >> Michel S. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
