Well you have it in your local repo, that "counts" ;) In fact that is the big advantage of a DVCS, that you can make local commits. This also means that if for some reason the big server in the sky goes down, your repo has all the information that the big sky one did and can be used by anyone to continue working on the project (they can get a clone of your repo). Thus the Distributed part of DVCS.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:16 PM, e <evier...@gmail.com> wrote: > Git seems pretty interesting to me, too, which is why I tried for 7 hours > on my somewhat outdated Mac to try to get it to work nicely with eclipse and > the git eclipse plugin. It was a total nightmare. I want my 7 hours back. > Eventually I went with tried and true svn ... planning to revisit in the > future. But let me understand ... when you do a commit, you haven't really > done anything that "counts"? Loaded question, I know, but it seems like you > have to do a commit, and then do a "send" or something, to actually share > your changes. Is that right? > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Michel S. <michel.syl...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Apr 24, 3:06 pm, Victor Rodriguez <vict...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > There recently was a ton of traffic about SCM in the "Path to 1.0" >> > > thread. Google made the following announcement: >> > >> > >http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2009/04/mercurial-support-for. >> .. >> > >> > > Does this make changing the SCM tool to Hg a real possibility? While >> > > this might not be such a big deal for Clojure core, I would *LOVE* an >> > > easy way to fork contrib, and I bet I'm not the only one. >> > >> > For what it is worth, I would also like the source to be kept under Hg. >> > >> Hmm. How much of this has to do with Guido working for Google? ;). I'd >> personally rather wait and see if Git ends up being added to the list >> of supported DVCS: some open-source projects (GNOME, Dragonfly BSD) >> are moving to it rather than Hg. >> >> I already have Git mirrors of the clojure and clojure-contrib >> repositories; they are trivial to set up and keep up-to-date. A lot of >> people here are probably doing that as well. Git even works relatively >> well on Windows (I've used it lightly and not encountered a bug yet). >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Michel S. >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---