Hey Sean, Thanks for the pointer here. There's a lot of commonality, but mostly I think the products end up being different for two reasons:
1) For the moment, the contrib-autodoc stuff is targeting the googlecode wiki, which is a weird and gross thing of its own. I've been thinking of making some kind of builder syntax for it, but for the moment I'm just using formats. 2) Most of the work is in dealing with subversion and the like to check, get, build, etc. But looking at what the compojure guys are doing is interesting and educational. I think we have a ways to go in thinking about the amount of stuff we can do to leverage doc-oriented metadata in Clojure in a more flexible way. Tom On Apr 15, 7:07 am, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Check out the thread below in the Compojure group. Specifically, look > for the comment by Brain Carper > > http://groups.google.com/group/compojure/browse_thread/thread/67d92ce... > > Brian's code: > > http://briancarper.net/clojure/compojure-doc.clj > > This might be an alternate approach to the problem. > > On Apr 14, 5:59 pm, Tom Faulhaber <tomfaulha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Jason, > > > Thanks for the offer. I may take you up on it as I get this into > > "production" such as it is. > > > Sean, > > > Nothing that I found in contrib (but who knows, there's no > > documentation :-)). Rich posted some code (which I'm using in a > > modified version in the center of things) for doing the API paage for > > clojure.org here:http://paste.lisp.org/display/77339 > > > When I get my code looking anything other than nasty (and anyone who's > > looked at pprint knows that's a low bar!), I'll at least put it up on > > github. Eventually I may add it to contrib, too, if the community > > feels it should go (but let's solve the problem ahead of us). > > > Laurent, > > > You seem to be going in the opposite direction from Konrad and I would > > worry about the duplication. I would be more inclined to think about a > > single markup format for :doc strings that could be converted for the > > various uses. But that's really a language change at some level, so > > I'd rather defer that until we see how this stuff is used. > > > But to be honest, I haven't read your comments that closely because > > today has been a long day. Maybe later tonight... > > > Thanks for all the feedback, guys! > > > Tom --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
