Thanks all for the feedback. One impression I get is that it seems the
existing community is getting along ok on trunk, so perhaps we also
need to consider those not yet using Clojure, possibly even because of
a lack of 1.0.

I joked about book authors, but I'd like to make it clear that I think
it is very important that Stuart's book correspond to a release of
Clojure. It would be huge for newcomers coming to Clojure find a book
that says "Covers Clojure 1.0", and a compatible download for 1.0.x
with the latest fixes.

Stuart has worked hard on tracking the latest changes, as have I in
trying to get in those changes that would be breaking as soon as I
could before 1.0. I'm presuming it's not too late to get "Covers
Clojure 1.0" in there (Stuart?), and, if so, it is a factor in this
decision.

I'll also add that there is plenty more I'd like to do, and as soon as
I get into that trunk will again be changing rapidly. There simply has
to be a branch for fixes only.

As to the feedback:

A library management system seems like a tall order for a language
1.0. It is certainly an interesting and useful pursuit, but given the
variety of approaches and opinions therein, it seems a bit out in
front of us. Advantages of Maven vs Ivy vs whatever should be
separate. Git is not going to happen any time soon, great as it may
be, given the current lack of infrastructure (google code) and tools
support. Is there some respect in which this impacts the core? It
would seem dangerous to marry any single approach in the language
itself.

A deprecation policy is a good idea. Backward compatibility mode is
unlikely.

As for tests, there are tests in:

http://code.google.com/p/clojure-contrib/source/browse/#svn/trunk/src/clojure/contrib/test_clojure

Anyone who wants more tests can contribute them.

Overall, I'm getting feature requests (more change!) and not a strong
drive for 1.0 stability. If you feel otherwise, please speak up.
Otherwise, my conclusion is that 1.0 may be more important for not-yet-
users wary of working from source.

Rich

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to