You mean by Sun Norvig conventions right ? ;) http://code.google.com/p/clojure/issues/detail?id=16&q=pretty&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Reporter%20Owner%20Summary
On Mar 24, 1:46 am, Mark Volkmann <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for running all the code under src/jvm through some code formatter > that uses something at least similar to the Sun Java conventions. > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:59 PM, BerlinBrown <berlin.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I was curious about how some of the clojure code worked and observed > > that the coding style is a little bit non idiomatic from typical Java > > coding conventions. E.g. there aren't any javadoc comments on methods > > or classes, non standard indents. > > > Something like checkstyle might prove useful. > > >http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/ > > > While, every programmer balks at conventions, I am sure there is a > > mountain of evidence for increased overall maintenance and other > > benefits. > > > I know, I will get suggestions for clojure/lisp coding style. > > -- > R. Mark Volkmann > Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
