Javadoc would be nice, but I do note that Rich's Java code is pretty darn clear ;) I also note the indentation style is similar to Whitesmith's according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style. I've always preferred the BSD curly brace level matching convention over the K&R derivatives.
That said aren't we all hacking on Clojure because we're done with this "convention" thing? ;) David On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Laurent PETIT <[email protected]>wrote: > Why you guys want to suppress all the fun from clojure ? ;-) :-p > > > 2009/3/24 Mark Volkmann <[email protected]> > > >> +1 for running all the code under src/jvm through some code formatter >> that uses something at least similar to the Sun Java conventions. >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:59 PM, BerlinBrown <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > I was curious about how some of the clojure code worked and observed >> > that the coding style is a little bit non idiomatic from typical Java >> > coding conventions. E.g. there aren't any javadoc comments on methods >> > or classes, non standard indents. >> > >> > Something like checkstyle might prove useful. >> > >> > http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/ >> > >> > While, every programmer balks at conventions, I am sure there is a >> > mountain of evidence for increased overall maintenance and other >> > benefits. >> > >> > I know, I will get suggestions for clojure/lisp coding style. >> >> -- >> R. Mark Volkmann >> Object Computing, Inc. >> >> >> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
