On Mar 22, 12:57 pm, Bradbev <brad.beveri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is the clojure-contrib portion of Clojure meant to act as a package > system like Cabel, CPAN, etc? I suspect not. Clojure-contrib is more > like the standard library that comes with Clojure.
Speaking as a contributor, I don't think it's big enough to qualify as a standard library yet. It's just odds and ends, plus a testing ground for possible new features in core. On Mar 22, 5:46 pm, Christian Vest Hansen <karmazi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was hoping that we could piggy-back on one of Java's packaging > ... the Maven repository system is pretty popular and even > supported by build tools other than Maven Maven is a big, complicated beast, but... it's there, it's widely deployed, and it's Java. That makes it a good choice in my book. The less new infrastructure Clojure requires, the better, I believe. -Stuart Sierra --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
