Haven't read the article yet but thanks for the work, will definitely give it a read asap. After hearing (already a while ago) that Storm moved to Java, I'm happy to hear Clojure is still actively used (and even instrumental) in your current work.
On Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 11:42:36 PM UTC-4 natha...@gmail.com wrote: > Probably not in the near future. Once we're close to being ready for > production usage, we'll be releasing a preview post demonstrating how our > product works through an example of using it to replicate a widely-used > service in a comparatively minuscule amount of code. Though we're already > able to build and run arbitrary applications at scale, we still have a lot > of work to do on operational features to enable the fault-tolerance > necessary for production usage. > > On Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 5:24:00 PM UTC-10 Robert P. Levy wrote: > >> Great post on the technical choices made in developing this platform. Do >> you plan on writing a post that describes in detail the system architecture >> that is the bread and butter of the product/platform itself? >> >> The website intriguingly states, "Red Planet Labs is pioneering a >> radically new kind of software tool. It's not just for the initial >> construction of an application, but also encapsulates deployment, >> monitoring, and maintenance. It implements the first truly cohesive model >> for building software applications – a set of abstractions that can build >> any application at any scale with greatly reduced engineering cost." >> >> It seems like a full article expanding on the infrastructure-level >> design, and the approach to generalizing and abstracting infrastructure, >> would be very interesting. >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 7:12 PM Nathan Marz <natha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Derek – we have a bunch of open-source on our Github >>> <https://github.com/redplanetlabs>. I'd like to release our new >>> language one day, but that won't be for a long time. When I release it I >>> want to do it the right way – extensive documentation, academic papers, and >>> a commitment to supporting the language in broader usage. At our early >>> stage we just don't have the bandwidth for that as we're working hard to >>> get our first product out the door. Plus at the moment out language is our >>> "secret weapon" :) >>> >>> Leandro – I started working on this codebase well before spec was >>> released. Had spec existed when I started I would have explored it more >>> thoroughly, but Schema has met our needs very gracefully. As for >>> deterministic simulation, it's orthogonal to techniques like test.check. I >>> suggest you check our our earlier blog post >>> <https://tech.redplanetlabs.com/2021/03/17/where-were-going-we-dont-need-threads-simulating-distributed-systems/> >>> >>> on the subject. >>> >>> On Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 3:09:28 PM UTC-10 ldoc...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, 15:06 natha...@gmail.com, <natha...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Please give the post a read, and I'm happy to answer any questions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Nice article, Nathan. Definitely, it would be nice to see the code :-) >>>> >>>> Just curious... >>>> >>>> 1) You mention using Schema for data definition and validation. Did you >>>> consider using other options for this, such as clojure.spec? What's your >>>> experience with it/them? >>>> >>>> 2) You mention using "deterministic simulation". Did you consider using >>>> other options for this, such as test.check? What's your experience with >>>> it/them? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Leandro >>>> >>>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/70353370-6dd2-4ddc-af82-2fce32ee6bden%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/70353370-6dd2-4ddc-af82-2fce32ee6bden%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/a06023c2-e5c3-4d54-84ea-61825e9898can%40googlegroups.com.
