Probably not in the near future. Once we're close to being ready for production usage, we'll be releasing a preview post demonstrating how our product works through an example of using it to replicate a widely-used service in a comparatively minuscule amount of code. Though we're already able to build and run arbitrary applications at scale, we still have a lot of work to do on operational features to enable the fault-tolerance necessary for production usage.
On Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 5:24:00 PM UTC-10 Robert P. Levy wrote: > Great post on the technical choices made in developing this platform. Do > you plan on writing a post that describes in detail the system architecture > that is the bread and butter of the product/platform itself? > > The website intriguingly states, "Red Planet Labs is pioneering a > radically new kind of software tool. It's not just for the initial > construction of an application, but also encapsulates deployment, > monitoring, and maintenance. It implements the first truly cohesive model > for building software applications – a set of abstractions that can build > any application at any scale with greatly reduced engineering cost." > > It seems like a full article expanding on the infrastructure-level design, > and the approach to generalizing and abstracting infrastructure, would be > very interesting. > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 7:12 PM Nathan Marz <natha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Derek – we have a bunch of open-source on our Github >> <https://github.com/redplanetlabs>. I'd like to release our new language >> one day, but that won't be for a long time. When I release it I want to do >> it the right way – extensive documentation, academic papers, and a >> commitment to supporting the language in broader usage. At our early stage >> we just don't have the bandwidth for that as we're working hard to get our >> first product out the door. Plus at the moment out language is our "secret >> weapon" :) >> >> Leandro – I started working on this codebase well before spec was >> released. Had spec existed when I started I would have explored it more >> thoroughly, but Schema has met our needs very gracefully. As for >> deterministic simulation, it's orthogonal to techniques like test.check. I >> suggest you check our our earlier blog post >> <https://tech.redplanetlabs.com/2021/03/17/where-were-going-we-dont-need-threads-simulating-distributed-systems/> >> >> on the subject. >> >> On Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 3:09:28 PM UTC-10 ldoc...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, 15:06 natha...@gmail.com, <natha...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Please give the post a read, and I'm happy to answer any questions. >>>> >>> >>> Nice article, Nathan. Definitely, it would be nice to see the code :-) >>> >>> Just curious... >>> >>> 1) You mention using Schema for data definition and validation. Did you >>> consider using other options for this, such as clojure.spec? What's your >>> experience with it/them? >>> >>> 2) You mention using "deterministic simulation". Did you consider using >>> other options for this, such as test.check? What's your experience with >>> it/them? >>> >>> Best, >>> Leandro >>> >>>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/70353370-6dd2-4ddc-af82-2fce32ee6bden%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/70353370-6dd2-4ddc-af82-2fce32ee6bden%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/e8c5a3b0-e4e9-4d02-a616-607157070580n%40googlegroups.com.
