On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi <squee...@mac.com> wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote: > >> * Concerning the name to give to this function : maybe ->? instead of ?->, >> if you think we can live with this "violation" to the predicate convention ? > > I like these: > > .?. > -?> > > They fit with the criteria that Rich laid down in the other thread > (paraphrasing): > > neither a leading nor a trailing question mark use > > These spellings fit that rule and I also like them in their own right.
Given a choice between the two, I'd choose -?> -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
