Those are the two obvious options and both are fine. The latter makes loading and use of the spec optional. If you do that, we recommend putting specs in the.namespace.specs for the.namespace.
On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 12:00:30 PM UTC-5, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: > > I'm thinking of releasing a tiny library (really, just one macro), and I > want to document/validate using spec. > > What's the accepted approach for bundling the macro with its spec: > > - Just add the spec right in the namespace with the macro > - Have a second optional namespace that provides the spec for the macro > - Something I haven't thought of > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Senior Mobile Developer at Walmart Labs > > Creator of Apache Tapestry > > (971) 678-5210 > http://howardlewisship.com > @hlship > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
