I think that answers my question. I just wanted an approximate idea of the kind of LTS this would have, before depending on it. I meant like if it would keep up with the changes to spec before release. So I'm glad to hear it will and possibly even beyond.
Thanks. On Thursday, 6 April 2017 11:43:55 UTC-7, Jeaye wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:31:46AM -0700, Didier wrote: > > Looks good. May I ask, what kind of support are we looking at? Is this > something you reasonably see being carried to the release of 1.9? Or was it > more of an experiment? > > I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "carried to the release of 1.9" > here. I don't expect that Alex, Rich, et al. will change their minds, > again, about clojure.spec's instrument validating :ret and :fn specs. As > such, I intend for Orchestra to exist up until, and well beyond, Clojure > 1.9. > > Orchestra is an integral part of my workflow and likely the biggest > improvement to my Clojure toolchain, along with clojure.spec, in the past > few years. > > Let me know if I can help any further. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
