On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:31:46AM -0700, Didier wrote: > Looks good. May I ask, what kind of support are we looking at? Is this > something you reasonably see being carried to the release of 1.9? Or was it > more of an experiment?
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "carried to the release of 1.9" here. I don't expect that Alex, Rich, et al. will change their minds, again, about clojure.spec's instrument validating :ret and :fn specs. As such, I intend for Orchestra to exist up until, and well beyond, Clojure 1.9. Orchestra is an integral part of my workflow and likely the biggest improvement to my Clojure toolchain, along with clojure.spec, in the past few years. Let me know if I can help any further. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
