On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Petr <petrg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have slightly unrelated question. Why core.async is still not 1.x > version? >
Because we don't really associate any emotional significance to the version number. > Is there a feeling that API is still experimental and not mature enough? > The existing API is not experimental (the alpha designation was removed). Many people use core.async in production, so seems mature enough. > Or authors of core.async are not happy with implementation? > We are happy. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
