On Feb 23, 9:31 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim <straszheimjeff...@gmail.com> wrote: > The speed of the JVM's big ints, and therefore Clojure's, doesn't seem to be > competitive. Clearly the JVM's big ints doesn't compare favorably with GMP. On the other hand, Clojure falls near the middle of the range of the various lisps and schemes. It's about as fast as LispWorks 32-bit for example. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- Re: challenge: best fibo implementation ... Christophe Grand
- Re: challenge: best fibo implementa... Stuart Halloway
- Re: challenge: best fibo implem... Laurent PETIT
- Re: challenge: best fibo im... Christophe Grand
- Re: challenge: best fib... Laurent PETIT
- Re: challenge: bes... Christophe Grand
- Re: challenge: best fibo implementation ... Stephen C. Gilardi
- Re: challenge: best fibo implementa... chris
- Re: challenge: best fibo implementa... Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: challenge: best fibo implem... Jeffrey Straszheim
- Re: challenge: best fibo im... Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: challenge: best fib... Michel Salim
- Re: challenge: best fibo implem... Dimiter "malkia" Stanev
- Re: challenge: best fibo im... Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: challenge: best fibo implem... Luke VanderHart
- Re: challenge: best fibo im... Raffael Cavallaro