On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Dan <redalas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It depends on common lisp instead of clojure? :)
Oh, it requires Common Lisp to do the translation? Bleh. > How does ClojureScript integrates with Javascript libraries? It's almost > unthinkable now to do a site that is not based on some of the fine JS > libraries available. Approximately as well as Clojure integrates with Java, and via the same dot forms. > It's also a reason why I want the generated code not to have > overhead, we don't want to pay that cost twice (for the library and > the clojure-ish behaviour). The ClojureScript runtime when compacted and compressed should only cost around 22KB. But of course even that is too much if you don't need immutable collections and such. --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
