On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:41 AM, Jan Rychter wrote: > > Following up on my own post: > > Jan Rychter <j...@rychter.com> writes: >> Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Jan 26, 11:15 am, Cosmin Stejerean <cstejer...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Rich Hickey >>>> <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Jan 25, 4:10 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> #- makes sense (CL didn't always make things the wrong way :-) >>>>>> And indeed, #; *could* break a lot of already existing editors >>>>>> for a >>>>>> while >>>>> Yes, the issues are: >>>> >>>>> #; is bad for editors >>>> >>>>> #- would be incompatible with CL's #-, and couldn't be upgraded to >>>>> compatibility without breakage. >>>> >>>>> I'm not sure the latter is a big deal, as #-test ... in CL is >>>>> just an >>>>> alternative for #+(not test) ... >>>> >>>> Is ## an option? >>>> >>> How about #_ ? >> >> I would prefer #-, but if you think you might want to have a reader >> conditional system similar to CL in the future, #_ is fine as well. >> >> Actually, any character is better than plucking out multi-line >> forms and >> commenting them out :-) >> >> --J. > > Any chance this could get implemented, Rich? I really miss that > functionality when developing with Clojure. >
#_ has been in since rev 1253. Sorry I didn't mention it here, but I'm not always doing that anymore given the available project feeds and the already high volume. http://code.google.com/p/clojure/feeds Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
