> > > > So, as a long-time .NET guy, IronClojure seems like the best name, in > > terms of making it obvious what it does: it's like IronRuby/Python, > > but it's Clojure. Failing that, it seems like NClojure fits the > > pattern of other JVM-ported efforts. I realize that there's already an > > Enclojure. > > > > Just to throw more chaff into the air: > > > > * CoCLR: Clojure on the CLR. (Maybe pronounced cochlear?) > > * Coc: Same as above. > > * CoNET: Clojure on .NET. > > * Icon: An Implementation of Clojure on .NET. > > There is an existing programming language named Icon, developed by > Ralph Griswold (the same guy who developed SNOBOL). Icon has been > around for decades, and is an interesting language in its own right. > > > * Ichor: I can't think of an acronym here, but I want to. :) >
As far as I understood, the rules are that it should be derived from Clojure and sports either an N or a CLR. So I suggest Conjure It looks like clojure, sounds pleasing, and sounds lispish (conj). And Lisp to me sounds like magic (in the Arthur C. Clarke meaning that it is a technology sufficiently advanced that it is indistinguishable from it). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
