I definitely support your second option; first / rest / next. In my mind, rest means "collection of remaining items" and should return a collection, and next will also do exactly what I would expect it to do. Clojure is sufficiently different from Common Lisp already that breaking the compatibilty of rest is a non-issue for me. As others have mentioned, a big part of the appeal of Clojure is being involved in the early stages of a language that has a real opportunity to grow "cleanly", with developer input and without the inertia of layers of past compromises. I really like Clojure so far, and thank Rich and the other main contributors for their work.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
