No, but I'm really learning as I go here. I'll look into it. On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Looks like you're moving apace! > > Have you considered query/subquery optimization instead of magic sets? > > Rich > > On Feb 8, 7:51 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim <straszheimjeff...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > By the way, if anyone on this list has experience implementing bottom-up > > optimizations for logic programs, particularly from the magic set family, > > and is willing to assist, please contact me. > > > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Jeffrey Straszheim < > > > > straszheimjeff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Stratified negation is working and in trunk. > > > > > I have some cool ideas of a simple, but powerful, way to implement > > > evaluable predicates. They'll likely make it in by midweek. > > > > > The the hard part (magic sets) begins. > > > > > On Feb 8, 11:43 am, Jeffrey Straszheim <straszheimjeff...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > I now have recursive queries working. My next 3 milestones are > > > stratified > > > > negation, evaluable predicates, and then some version of magic sets > > > > optimization. But now, as long as your queries are non-negated it is > > > > working. > > > > > >http://code.google.com/p/clojure-datalog/ > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
