On Feb 4, 1:45 am, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One thing I couldn't tell from the "lazier" doc is whether rest is
> only being kept around for backward compatibility or whether there
> still might be reasons to actively prefer rest to more.
rest is being kept for compatibility and ease of use. It can be quite
convenient on the consuming/terminal end of the chain, but its
continued use in lazy sequence functions is suspect.
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
