Streams were also intended for I/O. Is lazier addition also able to cope with I/O sucessfully? Can we have both - streams and lazy-seq?
My thought about streams is that if they get included, they could be looked at as unsafe operations in Java/C# or unchecked math operations - as long as programmer knows what he is doing, it is fine... Frantisek On 3 Ún, 15:31, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 2, 2:27 pm, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:05 PM, MikeM <michael.messini...@invista.com> > > wrote: > > > > There is a "lazy" branch in SVN. The "streams" branch has been > > > discussed, but I haven't seen any discussion of the "lazy" branch - > > > perhaps I missed it. > > > Here's a discussion from earlier today, mainly about the "lazy" branch: > > >http://clojure-log.n01se.net/date/2009-02-02.html#09:47 > > I've started documenting the lazy branch work here: > > http://clojure.org/lazier > > Feedback welcome, > > Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
