Agreed ;)

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Matt Moriarity <matt.moriar...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> I say go for it. maybe swank could use it for macroexpansions and
> stuff. the lack of pretty-print drives me crazy!
>
> On Jan 27, 10:56 am, Mike DeLaurentis <delauren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is anyone aware of a pretty-print function for Clojure? I saw there
> > was some discussion about it on this thread a while ago, but I don't
> > seem to see anything related to pretty-print in either the core or
> > clojure-contrib. If no one's working on implementing it, I might take
> > a stab at it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to