On Jan 26, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote: > > Hey, I just looked back at the original post that started the thread. > At some point, I had changed my function so (cartesian-product) > returned nil instead of (nil), but based on Jason's post, I've changed > it back in another paste annotation.
Hah, that would have been funny if after all this, the original point of the thread got lost :). Anyway, thanks for all your hard work on this! It's been very interesting for me, since I think I finally understand (at least somewhat) these "iterative" versions of things I've seen floating around. -Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
