Craig McDaniel <craig...@gmail.com> writes: > On Jan 19, 11:45 am, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: >> I noticed that very little of this code is specific to the REPL; the >> bulk of it is just dealing with creating and doing things with server >> sockets. Perhaps it could be included in clojure-contrib as a >> generalized server-sockets library if instead of calling (repl) it could >> take an optional argument for a different function to use? > > Thanks, that's a good point. I'm posting a new file server-socket.clj > that is more generic and includes the REPL as an example case.
I just rewrote part of my app to take advantage of this new library; it's been very useful for moving the dirty details out of my code. I wonder if it wouldn't be a good idea to move the call to binding from socket-repl into accept-fn. It seems like a reasonable default to rebind *in* and *out* for the duration of the accepting function; the example uses this as does my application. If this is desired, I can put together a patch and create an issue for it. -Phil --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
