On Jan 19, 8:12 pm, ".Bill Smith" <william.m.sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would you mind elaborating on that point? At a previous job, I worked
> on a corporate banking application that had numerous configuration
> settings. Thousands of companies used the application. It was
> impractical to test the application with every possible configuration
> vector (i.e. every combination of configuration settings), or even for
> every set of configuration vectors that were actually in use. It was
> a challenge to decide which configuration vectors to test against.
I'm not sure there's much to elaborate on. It's a problem, and one I
haven't solved, but I have some ideas. Ideally, I'd like to be able to
write something like:
(defn rnd-valid-name []
(rnd-str "[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9_]*")
(defn rnd-user []
{:uid (rnd-int 1 100)
:name (rnd-valid-name)
:created (rnd-past-date (weeks 3))})
- James
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
