On Jan 19, 6:44 pm, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1. I don't like the idea of putting tests next to the functions > > they're testing. > > That's cool with me, I won't force you to do it one way or the other.
And here I was ready to start a holy crusade against you ;) Honestly, it's cool with me too. I just figured it was worth mentioning an alternative viewpoint. > I think that's how the earliest implementations of behavior-driven > development in Java worked -- they used descriptive method names. > Sure, it's not as pretty, but it works. I like pretty enough that this matters to me, but to each their own. > > 3. The biggest problem I've had with tests is generating test data. > > Can't help you there, it least not right now. I'm open to suggestions. I was planning on creating a function to generate random strings out of a regular expression, though I'll first need to write a good parsing library first. I think my current focus, at least in the realm of testing, is to create functions for generating random test data. - James --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
