On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > When I had lazy-seq in play, many of those were defined that way. The > real cost is explaining either why lazy-seq is private, or, if public, > when/how to use it.
I'd certainly make use of lazy-seq if it were public. But assuming it's not made public, are you thinking right now that the underlying clojure.lang.LazySeq will eventually go away, or can power users use it and count on it being there, although not explicitly exposed through the api? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
