On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:50:44 -0500 "Stephen C. Gilardi" <squee...@mac.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 2008, at 6:48 AM, black...@ipowerhouse.com wrote: > > > This may be a problem with the way I'm doing things but I think it > > would be useful for the (connection) function of internal to not be > > internal. For example, lets say i do a query on a db to see if a > > user exists, if they don't I want to insert, so I need a new > > statement for that within the same transaction, i.e. i need to get > > hold of the connection itself to create my new statement. Right > > now, I'm doing (internal/connection) but I think it should be part > > of the public interface as it's something that happens frequently. > > connection is now (r340) part of the public API for > clojure.contrib.sql. Thanks for the feedback! > > --Steve > thanks, very useful. -- None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free — Goethe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
