On Wednesday 31 December 2008 09:10, Dave Griffith wrote: > No, but the semantics of java.lang classes are fully specified in the > Java spec,
Can you quote chapter and verse to this effect? I'm not finding it, at least not in "The Java™ Language Specification, Third Edition." There's an index entry that seems germane: "J -> Java -> java.lang package -> public types defined in, list of, 165" but there seems to be nothing on page 165 that corresponds to that index entry. > and JVM implementers are allowed to rely on them. It's > entirely possible that there are special case optimizations for > java.lang.Math calls. Randall Schulz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
