On 30 déc, 23:55, "Mark H." <mark.hoem...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 30, 10:26 am, Phil Hagelberg <technoma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually the LGPL allows linking to the library (somewhat different > than "using the code") from any program, even one which is not under > an open-source license. "L" used to stand for "library" and the > canonical example of a LGPL library is GNU's libc: any program can > link to it, and such linkage doesn't make the program have the same > license as libc.
Yes, this is what I remembered concerning LPGL. But it's not the problem at hand. swank-clojure is GPL. I'm a commiter of clojure-dev, willing to embed swank-clojure clojure files in the plugin : it will be distributed with the other files. And dynamically loaded when launching a clojure JVM from the eclipse instance of a user. So swank-clojure will not be hard-linked (at compilation time) to any of clojure-dev code. Nor will it be dynamically linked to any clojure- dev code at runtime : it will be dynamically linked to the clojure environment launched by clojure-dev on behalf of the user. But, it will be distributed along with clojure-dev's code (which is under EPL license). Will I violate the GPL, if I do that ? -- Laurent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
