Oh, nevermind. I hadn't switched my svn over to the Google Code
repository, so I was on 1162... up to 1185 and we're ok.

So yeah.

user=> (sort-by frest {:a 2 :b 3 :c 1})
([:c 1] [:a 2] [:b 3])

On Dec 27, 12:50 pm, kwatford <kwatf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorted maps sort only on keys, sorry. I was going to suggest using
> (sort-by frest foo) to at least get a sequence in the right order, but
> it seems like sorting might be broken at the moment? Looks like this
> response has turned into a bug report...
>
> user=> (sort [3 1 2])
> java.lang.ClassCastException: clojure.core$compare__2931
> (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)
>
> This is most likely because the comparator argument has been tagged as
> a Comparator, but the default 'compare' isn't a Comparator.
>
> user=> (sort (comp compare) [3 1 2])
> (1 2 3)
> user=> (sort-by frest (comp compare) foo)
> java.lang.ClassCastException: clojure.core$sort_by__3528$fn__3531
> (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)
>
> The comparison function that sort-by builds isn't a Comparator either.
> Drat.
>
> On Dec 27, 1:20 am, Mibu <mibu.cloj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to sort a sorted-map-by by value without a letrec?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to