On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Randall R Schulz <rsch...@sonic.net> wrote: > > On Friday 05 December 2008 15:36, Randall R Schulz wrote: >> I make pretty extensive use of nested classes >> (most significantly Enum types). >> >> I was wondering if it might be a good idea to >> allow "dot" resolution to find such types. >> >> >> E.g.: >> >> user=> tau.run.TSEvent.TSEKind >> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: tau.run.TSEvent.TSEKind (repl-1:7) >> >> user=> tau.run.TSEvent$TSEKind >> tau.run.TSEvent$TSEKind >> >> >> In Java code I can refer to TSEKind as tau.run.TSEvent.TSEKind so it >> seems natural to wonder if it would be reasonable to expect the same >> notation to resolve to the same type in Clojure? > > > Everyone gives this a "meh"?? > >
Dot is too overloaded in Java, and overloaded enough in Clojure. This one doesn't seem too important to me. Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
