Stuart Halloway a écrit : > But I bet that isn't the whole story. What are the counterarguments in > favor of non-lazy butlast? See http://clojure-log.n01se.net/date/2008-06-30.html#22:10b drop-last has been added to core.clj shortly after.
I guess butlast was a quick expedient to help write some macros. Christophe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---