Stuart Halloway a écrit :
> But I bet that isn't the whole story. What are the counterarguments in  
> favor of non-lazy butlast?
See http://clojure-log.n01se.net/date/2008-06-30.html#22:10b
drop-last has been added to core.clj shortly after.

I guess butlast was a quick expedient to help write some macros.

Christophe


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to