On Dec 9, 2:56 am, Dan Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just one bone to pick, though. The "are" macro doesn't work so well > if I want to test a custom assert-expr function that only deals with a > single expression.
Yeah, "are" isn't right. It's going to change, either by specifying the number of arguments, as Frantisek suggested, or with a template expression. For now, I recommend just using "is". -Stuart Sierra --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
